An Article by:

Ben Tanosborn

America, more than anything else, more than the proverbial land of opportunity, is very definitely something else. This nation of ours appears to be, first and foremost, a land of contradictions where, while the polls indicate most people feel the nation is being led in the wrong direction, we seem inclined to follow the same pied piper foreign policy.

Like it or not, in the US you cease to be an American (or rather, a “good American”) in the mind of your family, friends and neighbors the moment you deny the sacred dogma of inerrancy in US foreign policy. It may seem irrational to some people – either the statement on its face or what it’s implied by it – but deep inside that is the attitudinal belief of a vast majority of Americans I know and, I would venture to guess, most Americans anyone might know. And yet, that “patriotic majority,” so similar to me to the “moral majority” of time past, prefer not to think of themselves in any way, shape or form as nativists, jingoists, or otherwise exclusionary… convinced they are just down-to-earth regular folks: Main Street America.

Shortly after 9/11, political America – Democrats and Republicans – decided that it was about time to set aside their minute differences in foreign policy and act as a true united front. After all, they could always maintain some semblance of independence in the domestic arena, keeping a presumed differentiation alive and well… as if the gross mislabeling of the conservative and liberal captions defined how either party stood.

To our national detriment, including America’s standing in the world, such unnecessary and unwarranted united front was adopted by our political duopoly without as much as the blink of an eye; its ideas quickly permeating, and finding acceptance, through much of the citizenry of Main Street America. That citizen’s consent to relinquish rights and freedoms, giving blind permission, authorization, license and sanction allowing Bush’s White House to do as it pleased – all too often in open acts of criminality – has made it starkly clear that even if we claim to live under democratic rule, a so-called rule of law, our republic operates under a much different rule: the rule of consentership. And we, the citizenry, are simply the consenters! Such role reversal has made Americans the doting citizens of their uncle, Sam, an embarrassingly felonious uncle at that.

Let’s stop being hypocrites! Let’s stop blaming Bush for our own cowardice and lack of civic guts. Empowering a selected – not elected – government; granting clearance for the neocons to act; giving Bush the green light to invade Iraq; tolerating the usurping of our rights and freedoms; and going along with blatant economic malfeasance that is sure to bankrupt this nation, is unmistakably defining the highest level of consentership: what some of us would call the ultimate political pass.

Could it be that we are consenting because that is exactly what we want? That deep inside we know that someone needs to do the dirty work on our behalf, and that there needs to be a price paid? Are we really accomplices as much as we are consenters? Isn’t this a form of a dictatorship by that antidemocratic triumvirate that rules our lives: predatory capitalism, wasteful consumerism, and religious fundamentalism?

It’s beginning to look as if in early 2008, consentership will continue to dominate our Tweedledum-Tweedledee politics with Republicans and Democrats achieving renewed solidarity in foreign affairs, be it the forever-occupation (or negotiated presence) of Iraq, a non-stop continuing demonization of Iran and other “terror-villains,” or the constant denunciation of any nation that challenges our imperial hegemony and right to collect tribute in any way we see fit. Bush will soon be on his way out, but rest assured that his replacement will be a clone; or, as it is now starting to look, “a Bush in drag.” Perhaps we continue to be led astray with the promise of a lesser evil approach in domestic governance, but it will not be a lesser evil in the areas that are essential to bring trusting understanding among peoples of the world; it will not be a recipe to achieve peace on this earth, just as the organic compounds were to achieve life.

Of late, we have been looking at what is happening in Greater Russia, and are totally befuddled by the confrontational attitude of Mr. Putin. A man that not so long ago our own Duce, after looking into his eyes, tabbed as his straightforward, trustworthy friend Vladimir. My God, can someone explain how our prophetic, infallible Bush was able to get a sense of Putin’s soul and just a few years later have him turn against us?

But we shouldn’t fret over Putin’s reaction to our accustomed imperialist behavior, nor should we be surprised at his popularity in Greater Russia. Just like here in the US, there is also an apparent consensus in the neo-czarist land of Vladimir Putin, with an overwhelming majority matching their consentership against our very own. If we can be bipartisan in adopting – preserving might be a more appropriate word – an imperial foreign policy, it’s understandable that the Russians’ newly found economic success and national pride have turned their political behavior into one of consentership. The US should not expect anything better after our “screw-you” behavior during their cold turkey exit from communism, and now our insolence of trying to park missiles at their borders.

Consentership may not be dangerously consequential for small groups or nations that have no influence beyond their memberships or borders. For an imperial superpower it can turn out to be the most extreme among political extremes, perhaps the worst form of dictatorship. After all, we are consenting to the rule of a very few… and those few have been granted the power to push the nuclear button at will, to turn daylight into permanent night.

And we have the gall to criticize some nations because we tag them as dictatorships!

© 2007 Ben Tanosborn

Tags: american empire, anti imperialism, bush, citizens, democracy, economics, empire, Global, imperialism, liberty, National, political parties, politics
Categories: Commentary, National, Economics, Democracy, liberty, Politics, Empire, Imperialism
No Comments »

The need for direct democracy in America has never been more apparent than it is right now. We - the populace - are left impotent as the politicians whom we elected to office as representatives neglect to embody in their advocacies the will and interests that we - the American Public - possess, whose demands for a withdrawal from Iraq; whose oppositions to the advancing diminution of civil liberties; whose sentiments concerning illegal immigration; are all falling upon the unreceptive ears of the Congress and the White House.

It has become clear following the Democratic procurement of power in the two Congressional bodies that the people of America do not have a voice in the affairs of their government. Despite the lofty declarations of intent enunciated by the Democratic leadership during the campaigns leading to the expulsion of Republicans from Congress, the Democrats have delivered nothing.

For example, the marginal increase in the minimum wage successfully installed by the Democrats is absolutely meaningless, since most States have already passed legislation rasing their own minimum wages to levels that exceed the hike enacted by the Democrats in the House and in the Senate. Furthermore, the additional sum specified in the legislation fails to amount to anything approximating a living wage. Therefore, what is the point? since those unfortunate enough to be working for minimum wage will continue to need assistance from government services, and - despite the hours and frenetic intensities at which they toil at their occupations - they will fail to accumulate the resources necessary to reinvest in themselves - through education or entrepreneurial ventures - so that they might ascend to a higher stratum within the American socio-economic stratifications.

Another instance of Democratic ineptitude involved the abundance of time that was wasted in the legislator-deal-making charade of representative democracy, which only resulted in a stunning failure to pass immigration reform. This demonstration of astoundingly acute incompetences on the parts of the Democratic and Republican leadership in the Senate will always have a place in the recesses of my memory due to the gaspingly condescending and equally idiotic speech given by Harry Reid, where he quoted Dr. Sues at length in an ill conceived rhetorical ploy to make his enormously convoluted, internally contradicting, and substantively hollow piece of legislation appear to be a pending bill that even a child could recognize as meritorious legislation in need of passing by Congress.

Reid’s lengthy quotation from a children’s book even outdid his previous remarks in support of legalizing illegal immigration, where he alluded to the need of casinos in his own State of Nevada not to lose their workforce of Latino maids. Although I certainly have sympathy for the Latino migrants who are exploited by the Las Vegas gambling industry, I cannot imagine a sector in the United States economy for which I could possibly possess less concern.

It is a wonder how this self-righteous idiot - the Senate Majority Leader - not only obtained his seat in the Senate, but came to control the Democratic caucus in this esteemed deliberative body.

To push on beyond Reid, we can cite the Democratic concessions to the White House with respect to the funding of the Iraq War. In defiance of the campaign promises that propelled the Democrats into power in the Congress, the Democrats in the House and Senate have given the Bush Administration exactly what it has insisted upon in form of the supplemental funding bills needed to persist in the financing of this black hole that has formed in what was previously the sovereign state of Iraq.

And finally, to top things off, the Democrats have passed a bill that was advertised as the modernization of FISA, which, in actuality, had nothing to do with revamping FISA in order for it to adequately address new technologies; rather, the legislation merely dismantled and discarded with significant aspects of the oversight that was previously performed by FISA. In short, going over and beyond even what was requested by the Imperial Presidency, the Democrats gave powers to the Executive Branch to monitor the activities of citizens without any oversight or check by the Judicial Branch of Government.

It has become clear that the Democratic Party presents no alternative venue of political representation for those of us who had, heretofore, perceived the Republican Party as the real threat to American civil liberties and economic prosperity. I think, at this point, we should feel compelled to accept what has become ostensible: America is not a democracy in any sense of the word. Remember, the Soviet Empire had elections, as well. However, similarly to the condition of American politics, the mere casting of a vote in an election had little or no consequence because, ultimately, government and its administration of public policies would be entirely the same no matter who came to be elected in the various branches of polity.

Russell Cole

Tags: bush, congress, democracy, Democrats, direct democracy, economics, government, labor, political parties, politics, Russell Coles Blog
Categories: Commentary, Economics, Democracy, government, Russell Cole's Blog, Politics, Congress, Labor, Direct Democracy
No Comments »

The attached list of amendments for ‘immigration Reform”

The attached list is extensive indeed. However, those whoa re interested should review those sponsored by the “Grand Bargainers” who we all recognize as Feinstein, Kennedy, McCain, Kyl, and Graham. You should also be interested in their cosponsors. These are the power brokers pushing this legislation. Of course in my opinion Mr. Reed is also a significant partner in the passage of this bill. He is in my opinion the “ram rod”.

So the task ahead is to evaluate just what these amendments do and what they do or don’ t do and how they impact Americans.

Now notice this. It is evident the large number of calls, emails and other notifications to Congress have and are making an impact to the extent that those who want this to ‘fly bye” are now urging “closure” which basically means it passed!

Read down the list or go to the web site and you have your answers.
In my opinion it matters not because those who want this past will do all they can to excerpt pressure to get it done. It is not about common sense, logic or really anything but what these people see as their thing to do. They are in my opinion in effect the taskmasters of old. [ Read my next article “Do as I say or else”.

Now these are “commendable people” as they say? So I offer to you this, just who and what now defines commendable or for that matter good? I am not a lawyer but I do hope we have some lawyers out there I do think you can find a bonanza using this new legislation as a defense.
1. S.AMDT.1146 to S.1348 to provide for the protection of unaccompanied alien children, and for other purposes.
Sponsor: Sen. Feinstein, Dianne [CA] (introduced 5/21/2007) Cosponsors (3)
Latest Major Action: 5/23/2007 Senate amendment agreed to. Status: Amendment SA 1146 agreed to in Senate by Voice Vote.

2. S.AMDT.1148 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen. McCaskill, Claire [MO] (introduced 5/21/2007) Cosponsors (1)
Latest Major Action: 5/21/2007 Senate amendment submitted

3. S.AMDT.1149 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen McCaskill, Claire [MO] (introduced 5/21/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/21/2007 Senate amendment submitted

4. S.AMDT.1150 to S.1348 In the nature of a substitute.
Sponsor: Sen Kennedy, Edward M. [MA] (introduced 5/21/2007) Cosponsors (1)
Latest Major Action: 6/5/2007 Cloture motion on amendment SA 1150 presented in Senate.

5. S.AMDT.1151 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Inhofe, James M. [OK] (introduced 5/22/2007) Cosponsors (16)
Latest Major Action: 5/22/2007 Senate amendment submitted

6. S.AMDT.1152 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Baucus, Max [MT] (introduced 5/22/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/22/2007 Senate amendment submitted

7. S.AMDT.1153 to S.1348 To strike the Y nonimmigrant guestworker program.
Sponsor: Sen Dorgan, Byron L. [ND] (introduced 5/22/2007) Cosponsors (1)
Latest Major Action: 5/22/2007 Senate amendment not agreed to. Status: Amendment SA 1153 not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 31 - 64. Record Vote Number: 174.

8. S.AMDT.1154 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Collins, Susan M. [ME] (introduced 5/22/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/22/2007 Senate amendment submitted

9. S.AMDT.1155 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Boxer, Barbara [CA] (introduced 5/22/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/22/2007 Senate amendment submitted

10. S.AMDT.1156 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Grassley, Chuck [IA] (introduced 5/22/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/22/2007 Senate amendment submitted

11. S.AMDT.1157 to S.1348 To strike title VI (related to Nonimmigrants in the United States Previously in Unlawful Status).
Sponsor: Sen Vitter, David [LA] (introduced 5/22/2007) Cosponsors (7)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment not agreed to. Status: Amendment SA 1157 not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 29 - 66. Record Vote Number: 180.

12. S.AMDT.1158 to S.1348 To amend the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 to facilitate information sharing between federal and local law enforcement officials related to an individual’s immigration status.
Sponsor: Sen Coleman, Norm [MN] (introduced 5/22/2007) Cosponsors (6)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment not agreed to. Status: Amendment SA 1158 not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 48 - 49. Record Vote Number: 177.

13. S.AMDT.1159 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Coleman, Norm [MN] (introduced 5/22/2007) Cosponsors (3)
Latest Major Action: 5/22/2007 Senate amendment submitted

14. S.AMDT.1160 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Brownback, Sam [KS] (introduced 5/22/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/22/2007 Senate amendment submitted

15. S.AMDT.1161 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Alexander, Lamar [TN] (introduced 5/22/2007) Cosponsors (2)
Latest Major Action: 5/22/2007 Senate amendment submitted

16. S.AMDT.1162 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Alexander, Lamar [TN] (introduced 5/22/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/22/2007 Senate amendment submitted

17. S.AMDT.1163 to S.1348 To establish an award to recognize companies for extraordinary efforts in English literacy and civics.
Sponsor: Sen Alexander, Lamar [TN] (introduced 5/22/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 6/4/2007 Senate amendment agreed to. Status: Amendment SA 1163 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.

18. S.AMDT.1164 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Alexander, Lamar [TN] (introduced 5/22/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/22/2007 Senate amendment submitted

19. S.AMDT.1165 to S.1348 To clarify rules applicable to aliens employed as dairy workers.
Sponsor: Sen Leahy, Patrick J. [VT] (introduced 5/22/2007) Cosponsors (3)
Latest Major Action: 5/23/2007 Senate amendment agreed to. Status: Amendment SA 1165 as modified agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.

20. S.AMDT.1166 to S.1348 To clarify that the revocation of an alien’s visa or other documentation is not subject to judicial review.
Sponsor: Sen Grassley, Chuck [IA] (introduced 5/23/2007) Cosponsors (2)
Latest Major Action: 6/4/2007 Senate amendment agreed to. Status: Amendment SA 1166 as modified agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.

21. S.AMDT.1167 to S.1348 To authorize the Attorney General to carry out a program, known as the Northern Border Prosecution Initiative, to provide funds to northern border States to reimburse county and municipal governments for costs associated with certain criminal activities, and for other purposes.
Sponsor: Sen Cantwell, Maria [WA] (introduced 5/23/2007) Cosponsors (6)
Latest Major Action: 6/4/2007 Senate amendment agreed to. Status: Amendment SA 1167 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.

22. S.AMDT.1168 to S.1348 To provide local officials and the Secretary of Homeland Security greater involvement in decisions regarding the location of border fencing.
Sponsor: Sen Hutchison, Kay Bailey [TX] (introduced 5/23/2007) Cosponsors (6)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Amendment SA 1168, previously agreed to, was modified by Unanimous Consent.

23. S.AMDT.1169 to S.1348 To reduce to 200,000 the number of certain non-immigrants permitted to be admitted during a fiscal year.
Sponsor: Sen Bingaman, Jeff [NM] (introduced 5/23/2007) Cosponsors (4)
Latest Major Action: 5/23/2007 Senate amendment agreed to. Status: Amendment SA 1169 agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 74 - 24. Record Vote Number: 175.

24. S.AMDT.1170 to S.1348 To amend the Help America Vote Act of 2002 to require individuals voting in person to present photo identification.
Sponsor: Sen McConnell, Mitch [KY] (introduced 5/23/2007) Cosponsors (3)
Latest Major Action: 6/5/2007 Proposed amendment SA 1170, pursuant to the order of the Senate of June 5, 2007, having failed to achieve the required 60 votes in the affirmative was withdrawn in Senate.

25. S.AMDT.1171 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Hutchison, Kay Bailey [TX] (introduced 5/23/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/23/2007 Senate amendment submitted

26. S.AMDT.1172 to S.1348 To ensure control of our Nation’s borders and strengthen enforcement of our immigration laws.
Sponsor: Sen Gregg, Judd [NH] (introduced 5/23/2007) Cosponsors (3)
Latest Major Action: 5/23/2007 Senate amendment agreed to. Status: Amendment SA 1172 agreed to in Senate by Voice Vote.

27. S.AMDT.1173 to S.1348 To provide for minimum sentences for aliens who renter the United States after removal.
Sponsor: Sen Graham, Lindsey [SC] (introduced 5/23/2007) Cosponsors (6)
Latest Major Action: 5/23/2007 Senate amendment agreed to. Status: Amendment SA 1173 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.

28. S.AMDT.1174 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Thune, John [SD] (introduced 5/23/2007) Cosponsors (1)
Latest Major Action: 5/23/2007 Senate amendment submitted

29. S.AMDT.1175 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Thune, John [SD] (introduced 5/23/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/23/2007 Senate amendment submitted

30. S.AMDT.1176 to S.1348 To establish commissions to review the facts and circumstances surrounding injustices suffered by European Americans, European Latin Americans, and Jewish refugees during World War II.
Sponsor: Sen Feingold, Russell D. [WI] (introduced 5/23/2007) Cosponsors (2)
Latest Major Action: 6/5/2007 Senate amendment agreed to. Status: Amendment SA 1176 pursuant to the order of June 5, 2007, having achieved the required 60 votes in the affirmative, was agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay. 67 - 26. Record Vote Number: 185.

31. S.AMDT.1177 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Bingaman, Jeff [NM] (introduced 5/23/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/23/2007 Senate amendment submitted

32. S.AMDT.1178 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Kerry, John F. [MA] (introduced 5/23/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/23/2007 Senate amendment submitted

33. S.AMDT.1179 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Lautenberg, Frank R. [NJ] (introduced 5/23/2007) Cosponsors (10)
Latest Major Action: 5/23/2007 Senate amendment submitted

34. S.AMDT.1180 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Hagel, Chuck [NE] (introduced 5/23/2007) Cosponsors (1)
Latest Major Action: 5/23/2007 Senate amendment submitted

35. S.AMDT.1181 to S.1348 To sunset the Y-1 nonimmigrant visa program after a 5-year period.
Sponsor: Sen Dorgan, Byron L. [ND] (introduced 5/23/2007) Cosponsors (3)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment not agreed to. Status: Amendment SA 1181 not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 48 - 49. Record Vote Number: 178.

36. S.AMDT.1182 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Thomas, Craig [WY] (introduced 5/23/2007) Cosponsors (1)
Latest Major Action: 5/23/2007 Senate amendment submitted

37. S.AMDT.1183 to S.1348 To reclassify the spouses and minor children of lawful permanent residents as immediate relatives.
Sponsor: Sen Clinton, Hillary Rodham [NY] (introduced 5/23/2007) Cosponsors (2)
Latest Major Action: 6/5/2007 Considered by Senate.

38. S.AMDT.1184 to S.1348 To establish a permanent bar for gang members, terrorists, and other criminals.
Sponsor: Sen Cornyn, John [TX] (introduced 5/23/2007) Cosponsors (2)
Latest Major Action: 6/5/2007 Considered by Senate.

39. S.AMDT.1185 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack [IL] (introduced 5/23/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/23/2007 Senate amendment submitted

40. S.AMDT.1186 to S.1348 To exempt children of certain Filipino World War II veterans from the numerical limitations on immigrant visas.
Sponsor: Sen Akaka, Daniel K. [HI] (introduced 5/23/2007) Cosponsors (6)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Amendment SA 1186, previously agreed to, was modified by Unanimous Consent.

41. S.AMDT.1187 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Allard, Wayne [CO] (introduced 5/23/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/23/2007 Senate amendment submitted

42. S.AMDT.1188 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Allard, Wayne [CO] (introduced 5/23/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/23/2007 Senate amendment submitted

43. S.AMDT.1189 to S.1348 To eliminate the preference given to people who entered the United States illegally over people seeking to enter the country legally in the merit-based evaluation system for visas.
Sponsor: Sen Allard, Wayne [CO] (introduced 5/23/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 6/5/2007 Senate amendment not agreed to. Status: Amendment SA 1189 not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 31 - 62. Record Vote Number: 182.

44. S.AMDT.1190 to S.1348 To require undocumented immigrants receiving legal status to pay owed back taxes.
Sponsor: Sen McCain, John [AZ] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (3)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment agreed to. Status: Amendment SA 1190 as modified agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.

45. S.AMDT.1191 to S.1348 To provide safeguards against faulty asylum procedures and to improve conditions of detention.
Sponsor: Sen Lieberman, Joseph I. [CT] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 6/5/2007 Considered by Senate.

46. S.AMDT.1192 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Hutchison, Kay Bailey [TX] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment submitted

47. S.AMDT.1194 to S.1348 To modify the deadline for the family backlog reduction.
Sponsor: Sen Menendez, Robert [NJ] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (8)
Latest Major Action: 6/5/2007 Considered by Senate.

48. S.AMDT.1195 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Ensign, John [NV] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (1)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment submitted

49. S.AMDT.1196 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen DeMint, Jim [SC] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment submitted

50. S.AMDT.1197 to S.1348 To require health care coverage for holders of Z nonimmigrant visas.
Sponsor: Sen DeMint, Jim [SC] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 6/5/2007 Senate amendment proposed (on the floor)

51. S.AMDT.1198 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Boxer, Barbara [CA] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment submitted

52. S.AMDT.1199 to S.1348 To increase the number of green cards for parents of United States citizens, to extend the duration of the new parent visitor visa, and to make penalties imposed on individuals who overstay such visas applicable only to such individuals.
Sponsor: Sen Dodd, Christopher J. [CT] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (1)
Latest Major Action: 6/5/2007 Considered by Senate.

53. S.AMDT.1200 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Gregg, Judd [NH] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment submitted

54. S.AMDT.1201 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Allard, Wayne [CO] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment submitted

55. S.AMDT.1202 to S.1348 To provide a date on which the authority of the section relating to the increasing of American competitiveness through a merit-based evaluation system for immigrants shall be terminated.
Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack [IL] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (1)
Latest Major Action: 6/5/2007 Considered by Senate.

56. S.AMDT.1203 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Cornyn, John [TX] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment submitted

57. S.AMDT.1204 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Cornyn, John [TX] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment submitted

58. S.AMDT.1205 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Cornyn, John [TX] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment submitted

59. S.AMDT.1206 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Cornyn, John [TX] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment submitted

60. S.AMDT.1207 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Cornyn, John [TX] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment submitted

61. S.AMDT.1208 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Cornyn, John [TX] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment submitted

62. S.AMDT.1209 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Cornyn, John [TX] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment submitted

63. S.AMDT.1210 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Cornyn, John [TX] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment submitted

64. S.AMDT.1211 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Cornyn, John [TX] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment submitted

65. S.AMDT.1212 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Cornyn, John [TX] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment submitted

66. S.AMDT.1213 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Cornyn, John [TX] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment submitted

67. S.AMDT.1214 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Cornyn, John [TX] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment submitted

68. S.AMDT.1215 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Cornyn, John [TX] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment submitted

69. S.AMDT.1216 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Cornyn, John [TX] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment submitted

70. S.AMDT.1217 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Cornyn, John [TX] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment submitted

71. S.AMDT.1218 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Cornyn, John [TX] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment submitted

72. S.AMDT.1219 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Cornyn, John [TX] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment submitted

73. S.AMDT.1220 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Gregg, Judd [NH] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment submitted

74. S.AMDT.1221 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Cardin, Benjamin L. [MD] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment submitted

75. S.AMDT.1222 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Cornyn, John [TX] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment submitted

76. S.AMDT.1223 to S.1348 To establish the American Competitiveness Scholarship Program.
Sponsor: Sen Sanders, Bernard [VT] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment agreed to. Status: Amendment SA 1223 as modified agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 59 - 35. Record Vote Number: 179.

77. S.AMDT.1224 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Coburn, Tom [OK] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment submitted

78. S.AMDT.1225 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Levin, Carl [MI] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment submitted

79. S.AMDT.1226 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Levin, Carl [MI] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment submitted

80. S.AMDT.1227 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Levin, Carl [MI] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment submitted

81. S.AMDT.1228 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Levin, Carl [MI] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (7)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment submitted

82. S.AMDT.1229 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Sununu, John E. [NH] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment submitted

83. S.AMDT.1230 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Cornyn, John [TX] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment submitted

84. S.AMDT.1231 to S.1348 To ensure that employers make efforts to recruit American workers.
Sponsor: Sen Durbin, Richard [IL] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (1)
Latest Major Action: 6/5/2007 Senate amendment agreed to. Status: Amendment SA 1231 agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 71 - 22. Record Vote Number: 183.

85. S.AMDT.1232 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Hutchison, Kay Bailey [TX] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment submitted

86. S.AMDT.1233 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Hutchison, Kay Bailey [TX] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment submitted

87. S.AMDT.1234 to S.1348 To save American taxpayers up to $24 billion in the 10 years after passage of this Act, by preventing the earned income tax credit, which is, according to the Congressional Research Service, the largest anti-poverty entitlement program of the Federal Government, from being claimed by Y temporary workers or illegal aliens given status by this Act until they adjust to legal permanent resident status.
Sponsor: Sen Sessions, Jeff [AL] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 6/5/2007 Considered by Senate.

88. S.AMDT.1235 to S.1348 To save American taxpayers up to $24 billion in the 10 years after passage of this Act, by preventing the earned income tax credit, which is, according to the congressional Research Service , the largest anti-poverty entitlement program of the Federal Government, from being claimed by Y temporary workers or illegal aliens given status by this Act until they adjust to legal permanent resident status.
Sponsor: Sen Sessions, Jeff [AL] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 6/5/2007 Considered by Senate.

89. S.AMDT.1236 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Baucus, Max [MT] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (1)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment submitted

90. S.AMDT.1237 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Bingaman, Jeff [NM] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment submitted

91. S.AMDT.1238 to S.1348 To increase the authorization of appropriations for the Border Relief Grant Program.
Sponsor: Sen Cornyn, John [TX] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 6/4/2007 Senate amendment agreed to. Status: Amendment SA 1238 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.

92. S.AMDT.1239 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Ensign, John [NV] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment submitted

93. S.AMDT.1240 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Cochran, Thad [MS] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment submitted

94. S.AMDT.1241 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Cochran, Thad [MS] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment submitted

95. S.AMDT.1242 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Lieberman, Joseph I. [CT] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (3)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment submitted

96. S.AMDT.1243 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack [IL] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (1)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment submitted

97. S.AMDT.1244 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Cornyn, John [TX] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment submitted

98. S.AMDT.1245 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Cornyn, John [TX] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment submitted

99. S.AMDT.1246 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Cornyn, John [TX] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment submitted

100. S.AMDT.1247 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Cornyn, John [TX] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment submitted

101. S.AMDT.1248 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Ensign, John [NV] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment submitted

102. S.AMDT.1249 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Cantwell, Maria [WA] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (3)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment submitted

103. S.AMDT.1250 to S.1348 To address documentation of employment and to make an amendment with respect to mandatory disclosure.
Sponsor: Sen Cornyn, John [TX] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 6/5/2007 Considered by Senate.

104. S.AMDT.1251 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Conrad, Kent [ND] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment submitted

105. S.AMDT.1252 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Feinstein, Dianne [CA] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment submitted

106. S.AMDT.1253 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Sessions, Jeff [AL] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment submitted

107. S.AMDT.1254 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Sessions, Jeff [AL] (introduced 5/24/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/24/2007 Senate amendment submitted

108. S.AMDT.1255 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Bond, Christopher S. [MO] (introduced 5/25/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 5/25/2007 Senate amendment submitted

109. S.AMDT.1257 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Domenici, Pete V. [NM] (introduced 6/4/2007) Cosponsors (3)
Latest Major Action: 6/4/2007 Senate amendment submitted

110. S.AMDT.1258 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Domenici, Pete V. [NM] (introduced 6/4/2007) Cosponsors (3)
Latest Major Action: 6/4/2007 Senate amendment submitted

111. S.AMDT.1259 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Domenici, Pete V. [NM] (introduced 6/4/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 6/4/2007 Senate amendment submitted

112. S.AMDT.1260 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Domenici, Pete V. [NM] (introduced 6/4/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 6/4/2007 Senate amendment submitted

113. S.AMDT.1261 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Domenici, Pete V. [NM] (introduced 6/4/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 6/4/2007 Senate amendment submitted

114. S.AMDT.1262 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Domenici, Pete V. [NM] (introduced 6/4/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 6/4/2007 Senate amendment submitted

115. S.AMDT.1263 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Domenici, Pete V. [NM] (introduced 6/4/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 6/4/2007 Senate amendment submitted

116. S.AMDT.1264 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Domenici, Pete V. [NM] (introduced 6/4/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 6/4/2007 Senate amendment submitted

117. S.AMDT.1265 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Domenici, Pete V. [NM] (introduced 6/4/2007) Cosponsors (1)
Latest Major Action: 6/4/2007 Senate amendment submitted

118. S.AMDT.1266 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Alexander, Lamar [TN] (introduced 6/4/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 6/4/2007 Senate amendment submitted

119. S.AMDT.1267 to S.1348 To remove the requirement that Y-1 nonimmigrant visa holders leave the United States before they are able to renew their visa.
Sponsor: Sen Bingaman, Jeff [NM] (introduced 6/4/2007) Cosponsors (1)
Latest Major Action: 6/5/2007 Senate amendment proposed (on the floor)

120. S.AMDT.1268 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Bingaman, Jeff [NM] (introduced 6/4/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 6/4/2007 Senate amendment submitted

121. S.AMDT.1269 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Bingaman, Jeff [NM] (introduced 6/4/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 6/4/2007 Senate amendment submitted

122. S.AMDT.1270 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Bingaman, Jeff [NM] (introduced 6/4/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 6/4/2007 Senate amendment submitted

123. S.AMDT.1271 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Conrad, Kent [ND] (introduced 6/4/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 6/4/2007 Senate amendment submitted

124. S.AMDT.1272 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Schumer, Charles E. [NY] (introduced 6/4/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 6/4/2007 Senate amendment submitted

125. S.AMDT.1273 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Schumer, Charles E. [NY] (introduced 6/4/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 6/4/2007 Senate amendment submitted

126. S.AMDT.1274 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Schumer, Charles E. [NY] (introduced 6/4/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 6/4/2007 Senate amendment submitted

127. S.AMDT.1275 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Boxer, Barbara [CA] (introduced 6/4/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 6/4/2007 Senate amendment submitted

128. S.AMDT.1276 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Boxer, Barbara [CA] (introduced 6/4/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 6/4/2007 Senate amendment submitted

129. S.AMDT.1277 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Kennedy, Edward M. [MA] (introduced 6/4/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 6/4/2007 Senate amendment submitted

130. S.AMDT.1278 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Kohl, Herb [WI] (introduced 6/4/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 6/4/2007 Senate amendment submitted

131. S.AMDT.1279 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Reid, Harry [NV] (introduced 6/4/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 6/4/2007 Senate amendment submitted

132. S.AMDT.1280 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Leahy, Patrick J. [VT] (introduced 6/4/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 6/4/2007 Senate amendment submitted

133. S.AMDT.1281 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen McCaskill, Claire [MO] (introduced 6/4/2007) Cosponsors (1)
Latest Major Action: 6/4/2007 Senate amendment submitted

134. S.AMDT.1282 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Isakson, Johnny [GA] (introduced 6/5/2007) Cosponsors (1)
Latest Major Action: 6/5/2007 Senate amendment submitted

135. S.AMDT.1283 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Durbin, Richard [IL] (introduced 6/5/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 6/5/2007 Senate amendment submitted

136. S.AMDT.1284 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Durbin, Richard [IL] (introduced 6/5/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 6/5/2007 Senate amendment submitted

137. S.AMDT.1285 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Grassley, Chuck [IA] (introduced 6/5/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 6/5/2007 Senate amendment submitted

138. S.AMDT.1286 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Grassley, Chuck [IA] (introduced 6/5/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 6/5/2007 Senate amendment submitted

139. S.AMDT.1287 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Grassley, Chuck [IA] (introduced 6/5/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 6/5/2007 Senate amendment submitted

140. S.AMDT.1288 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Grassley, Chuck [IA] (introduced 6/5/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 6/5/2007 Senate amendment submitted

141. S.AMDT.1289 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Grassley, Chuck [IA] (introduced 6/5/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 6/5/2007 Senate amendment submitted

142. S.AMDT.1290 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Grassley, Chuck [IA] (introduced 6/5/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 6/5/2007 Senate amendment submitted

143. S.AMDT.1291 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Grassley, Chuck [IA] (introduced 6/5/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 6/5/2007 Senate amendment submitted

144. S.AMDT.1292 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Grassley, Chuck [IA] (introduced 6/5/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 6/5/2007 Senate amendment submitted

145. S.AMDT.1293 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Grassley, Chuck [IA] (introduced 6/5/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 6/5/2007 Senate amendment submitted

146. S.AMDT.1294 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Grassley, Chuck [IA] (introduced 6/5/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 6/5/2007 Senate amendment submitted

147. S.AMDT.1295 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Grassley, Chuck [IA] (introduced 6/5/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 6/5/2007 Senate amendment submitted

148. S.AMDT.1296 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Grassley, Chuck [IA] (introduced 6/5/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 6/5/2007 Senate amendment submitted

149. S.AMDT.1297 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Grassley, Chuck [IA] (introduced 6/5/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 6/5/2007 Senate amendment submitted

150. S.AMDT.1298 to S.1348 Purpose will be available when the amendment is proposed for consideration. See Congressional Record for text.
Sponsor: Sen Grassley, Chuck [IA] (introduced 6/5/2007) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 6/5/2007 Senate amendment submitted

Robert T. Melaccio Sr. 2007 Copyright ©2007 Robert T Melaccio Sr.

Tags: bush, casual workers, citizens, economy, free trade agreements, immigration
Categories: Commentary
No Comments »

An Article by Ben Tanosborn

This last junket by Bush may have been considered a tour de force for US relations with Latin America, but it wasn’t much of a tour and definitely provided no feat; in fact, it was a total waste. Uruguay’s and Brazil’s heads of state, both in the opposite side of the political spectrum from Bush, were forced to appear diplomatically courteous, probably wondering why Condi Rice had cast them to play in this five-act farce. The stops in Colombia, Guatemala and Mexico did make a lot more sense since those nations are major suppliers for America’s top two illicit addictions: drugs and immigration. Uribe (Colombia) and Calderon (Mexico) have a good compa in Bush. Not the other leaders.

It was a meaningless trip for a meaningless dignitary to an already lost part of the world (in terms of special, neighborly relations). Latin Americans, at least the 80 percent who are dirt-poor, have realized that the US has never been their friend, only a detached stepmother; and that any future overtures probably carry price tags they can ill afford.

Why would the United States help Latin America? it never has! For a century all the programs and money invested in the Iberian Down Under have been either minuscule (programs) or have had exploitative results (investments). To hear Bush speak and say that the $1.6 billion sent last year went for ’social justice’ causes is going from the ridiculous (the small amount) to the sublime (stating that it was for worthwhile causes), back to the ridiculous (as most of those funds were used for military purposes to fight the FARC guerrillas in Colombia, or for the interdiction of drugs). In fact, Venezuela with a population one-twelfth that of the United States provided last year far more help to the people of Latin America, when you add the price breaks on oil to the direct aid, than the US. So stop the on-going deceit, Mr. President, social justice causes, you say?

But even if America of the North has never felt compelled to help the America to the South, it recognizes that the Latin folks play key roles in the USL: two great addictions. For better or for worse the Latin and Anglo parts of the hemisphere are linked in many ways; and that’s a fact that politicians there and here know quite well.

Politicians who proselytize supply-side economics have played working Americans for suckers for over a quarter of a century with their trickled-down economics. But, what’s just as bad is that politicians who refuse to acknowledge our demand-side realities have played all Americans for suckers twice that long. Republicans and Democrats, both!

We have been ‘at war’ with those who supply illicit drugs to our population for more than two generations, failing to admit that drug-addiction is mainly a demand problem, not supply. Having a Drug Czar and our war on drugs to defend our purity has been but a crock. If we stop being hypocrites and call a spade a spade, our level of success with this biological-social problem would be far greater domestically - at a much lower cost - and we wouldn’t have to cause so many problems to nations in Latin America that supply us. This is an issue where most intelligent people, capitalists or anarchists alike, would find total agreement: that it is nonsensical to treat the alcohol-drugs problem as criminality. But politicians have preferred to keep their eyes closed to this reality.

And, in a similar fashion, politicians have also decided to keep their eyes closed to the other domestic reality, one that now dominates the American landscape: undocumented or illegal immigration (adjective to be used depending on how you view the subject). Why? For the simple reason that this form of immigration is also an addiction, one that needs to be tackled from the demand, not the supply side. Again, just like the illicit drugs issue, it should not be treated as criminality. In both cases we need to quell or treat the demand with appropriate legislation that addresses all humane and social aspects, not just economic and political.

Americans’ addiction to undocumented labor is not just restricted to businesses but also the greedy side of the average Joe and Jane. Our anarchical state on the issue of illicit immigration is everyone’s fault, not just politicians of the right, or the other politicians of the lesser-right. The problem has been around for decades, was poorly addressed two decades ago, and now has become a monster that scares us all; a dragon that people demand be slain, calling for that knight, Jingo, and squires like Lou Dobbs and Patrick Buchanan to rid us of it once and for all, so that we may keep our whored virginity intact.

On his last stop in Mexico, Bush was admonished by that country’s recently elected (or not, according to his leftist challenger) mandatary that building a wall along the border is not the answer to stop his countrymen from crossing over. And Calderon is quite right about that. The US with its addiction has created an addiction for that country as well, as $20-30 billion are sent by the immigrants to their families in Mexico every year, the second largest source of revenue for that nation after the Almighty Crude.

A social worker friend, whose maternal grandparents had crossed the border illegally from Mexico in the 1950’s, told me last year - I assume it was in jest - that if the US really wanted to solve this crisis, not just for us but for the Latinos as well, we should round up all able-bodied undocumented workers and give them some Al-Qaeda type of training for six or eight weeks, then send them back to their countries of origin with an AK-47 in their hands, and a promise that the US would help once they mow down their corrupt governments. I didn’t have the heart to tell her that this nation neither funds nor gives its imprimatur to revolutions by the oppressed; it’s only the oppressors we help. It’s the nature of predatory capitalism - how many times must we be told!

As for America’s two great addictions, we’ll continue to do little or nothing, blaming - as always - the supply-side.

© 2007 Ben Tanosborn [send him email]
www.tanosborn.com

Tags: bush, Drug War, drugs, empire, foreign policy, Global, immigration, latin america
Categories: Commentary, Global, Empire, Foreign Policy, Drug War
2 Comments »

Copyright 2007 Ben Tanosborn
www.tanosborn.com

Thomas Gray’s maxim stating that ‘ignorance is bliss’ has been both, widely accepted and widely refuted. Proponents and opponents to what that gentleman said, or meant to say, back in 1742 seem to gather with equally opposing strength as centuries pass. Of late, however, the people of Latin America may have given us a replacement to that axiom, coining with their actions a true gem: Bliss is being ignored by the US!

And you know what? They may have come up with an irrefutable truism when we try to make sense of what they mean by that. However, what they are saying south of the border and what we get from America’s corporate press confound us as if originating in Babel. Commentary by so-called experts on Latin America, usually from think-tanks of convenience - those from where most propaganda germinates which serves the needs of both the White House and the State Department - seem to always give us a minority or dissenting view - something which would be acceptable were it not presented as the majority or prevailing view. And that’s basically what we get, minority-imposed views.

Recently I came across an article-commentary typical of what’s being written these days; it was penned by Alejandro Chafuen from Atlas Economic Research Foundation, under a catchy headline, Latin America won’t just sit still and be ignored - Our southern neighbors grow politically restive with U.S. inaction to their legitimate economic worries. What, you say! Is this individual for real or is he just a PR man for the Latin elite?

The fact that George W. Bush has ignored the breaking of political piatas south of the border - way, way south of the Rio Grand - might have made the powerful local elite, and their squire-class of enablers, politically restive in Central and South America; but as far as most of the people who live there, those best described as without a pied - terre in Miami or elsewhere in the States or Europe, these past six years have proven to be a true blessing, bringing a ray of hope for a true beginning of social and economic reform. It’s not an anti-democratic or anti-American trend that is taking place, as we are being led to believe by a shamelessly lying government and a conformational press. What’s happening in the Latin Down Under is not really about us, it’s about them; about people freeing themselves from us, the ‘corporate America’ that has kept the powerless in those nations as permanent beggars, at times mistakenly looking northward for alms.

At this point, all we have seen is nothing more than the unlocking of the gates to allow passage of both political reform and economic equity for hundreds of millions of Latin Americans. Whether or not these peaceful socio-economic revolutions succeed, and to what degree, remains an experimental unknown for now.

What the governments of Ortega (Nicaragua), Chavez (Venezuela), Correa (Ecuador), Morales (Bolivia), Lula (Brazil) - or the more acceptable, to the US government, political evolutions in Chile and Argentina - give us as a bottom line a decade or two from today, assuming the US does not intervene, will determine success or failure and not any ill-founded demagoguery pitting socialism against capitalism. Capitalism, defined as properly regulated free-enterprise, should be able to co-exist and thrive under almost any form of socialism. Only predatory capitalism will shrivel and die a natural death.

One thing we feel safe to bet on: results, no matter how dismal, cannot possibly be as bad as those obtained in the past under predatory capitalism, even if blasphemously camouflaged as free-enterprise; not for 70 percent of the people in the region, perhaps a much higher figure in some nations with larger indigenous population. The people are simply fed up, and have been saying so where it counts: at the ballot box. They are shouting to the four winds: enough!

For almost two centuries, Latin America has been Wednesday’s Child for the US. No sooner had the Iberian colonies asserted their independence in the Americas, that it was made known to them all new nations in the Western Hemisphere - British Canada excluded - were under the protection and foster care, of fair and wise Uncle Samuel. And for almost two centuries, the parasitic relationship between the Northern Giant and the Southern Lilliputians has not changed.

My own personal exposure to this Gringo-Latin relationship started at the tail end of the Alliance for Progress which had began a decade earlier by John F. Kennedy with little in the way of funds, but much hullabaloo and tear-jerking rhetoric to counter what was seen as a possible communist threat from Cuba to ‘US interests.’ An overall failure, since it was unable to meet even the pygmy goals stated in 1961 at Punta del Este in education, health, and economic well-being for most Latin Americans, it is symbolic of what the US had done before, or what has done since in Latin America. The US invested less than $1 per individual per year, and that insignificant figure was not even in net transfers of resources and development.

The Alliance for Progress was little more than a PR job that could not cut the mustard with even the simpletons among economists. Who could believe that the powerful elite would allow any land reform, or more equitable income distribution, or more restrain by the powerful in abusing those who lacked power; the powerful being the team of corporate Yanks and local-elite? Dictatorships multiplied during that period with our consent, and often with our direct help, and for all our freedom-talking rhetoric we helped hang democracy in every town square. As for anecdotes, I have dozens of them, many as an admittedly participant, and where the Agency for International Development (USAID) was but a sad joke. Can anyone fathom the US guaranteeing low interest funding for low cost housing which ended up being owned by top military brass and business elite (Bolivia) or similar projects having the rich as beneficiaries?

Enough! No more PR safety-valves for global exploitation by predatory capitalists and their supporting governments. Doesn’t it make sense that Latin Americans are ecstatic as America, under Bush, pays full attention to the mess it has created in the Middle East ignoring its Latin protege’ Can we, at least this once, let people in other parts of the world determine what’s good for them� instead of homicidally intruding in their affairs?

It would be most difficult to refute that Bliss is being ignored - by the United States!

Tags: bolivia, brazil, bush, cuba, ecuador, foreign entanglements, foreign policy, Global, latin america, middle east, nicaragua, politics, venezuela
Categories: Commentary, Global, Politics, Foreign Policy
2 Comments »

An article by Joseph Murtagh, originally published in the Muckracker Report For the last six years, there’s been this assumption about George W. Bush that has occupied roughly the same place in people’s minds as the second law of thermal dynamics, or the existence of the moon, and which goes something like this: while the president might not be so strong on domestic issues, he’s very good at Protecting The Country From Terrorism.

Well, according to a story that came out recently, and which was mostly drowned out by the elections, the federal government’s record on fighting terrorism may not be as impressive as you think.

Researchers at Syracuse University’s Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) recently discovered that in the first nine months of fiscal year 2006 federal prosecutors rejected 87% of the international terrorism cases brought by the FBI, and the rejections have been increasing steadily since 2001.

The White House responded to the report the way they’ve always responded to empirical facts: by calling it “faulty” and “inaccurate,” and deriding its findings as “intellectually dishonest.”

Judging from last week’s election, though, I think the nation has already made up its mind about who’s being intellectually dishonest, and it’s definitely not the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse at Syracuse University. On the contrary, it’s the same bunch of yo-yos who cooked up false intelligence to dupe us into going to war with Iraq. Who held closed door meetings in Washington the day before 9/11 with a Pakistani general who a few weeks earlier had sent a $100,000 check to hijacker Mohammad Atta. Who granted no-bid contracts to a bunch of oil-rich mafia goons who were willing to sell our troops poisoned drinking water to save a buck.

And speaking of intellectual dishonesty, how about exploiting religious conservatives for political gains and then laughing about them behind their backs? Or cheating black people in Florida and Ohio out of their vote? Or leaking the name of a CIA officer to settle a political score? Or refusing to declassify important documents about 9/11? Or torturing innocent people and then lying about it? Or pretending to fight a phony war on terrorism while stealing our liberties from behind our backs?

In fact, the only honest moment in George W. Bush’s entire presidency came recently on the campaign trail when he finally admitted to voters in Nebraska the real reason why we’re in Iraq. “You can imagine a world,” he said, “in which these extremists and radicals got control of energy resources and then you can imagine them saying, ‘we’re going to pull a bunch of oil off the market to run your price of oil up unless you do the following.’”

No wonder the Republicans lost. I think Keith Olbermann said it best on Countdown: “Having frightened us, having bullied us, having lied to us, having ignored and rewritten the Constitution under our noses, having stayed the course, having denied you’ve stayed the course, having belittled us about ‘timelines’ but instead extolled ‘benchmarks,’ you’ve now resorted, sir, to this? We must stay in Iraq to save the $2 gallon of gas?”

If you spend time with the sorts of people I spend time with, you’ll probably have cynics in your life trying to persuade you from feeling overwhelmingly joyful at the results of this election, but for the moment at least, I think you should ignore them. We’ve witnessed an extraordinary thing in this country: the checking of a powerful totalitarian movement by the will of the people, just when a lot of us were beginning to fear that the system was beyond repair. There’s nothing phony or indoctrinated about the message Americans sent to Washington on Tuesday, and when you consider that it happened in spite of one of the most vicious propaganda campaigns in modern history, Americans have all the more reason to feel proud.

But this election hasn’t changed the fact that there are still people in the world who are being tortured and maimed and killed at the hands of this administration, and it’s for their sake that we must make Bush and the rest of them pay for their crimes. Read the following to find out what you can do to make that happen:

Subpoena Power, Congressional Hearings, and Special Counsel

But in the meantime, take faith that the America of Geronimo, Jefferson, and Muhammad Ali is live and kicking.

Tags: bush, Democrats, Elections, Global, homeland security, legislation, power, Republicans, society, Terrorism
Categories: Commentary, Global, Society, Power, Legislation, Homeland Security, Terrorism
No Comments »