populist bookstore populist party of america the populist quarterly

Iran was willing to cease uranium production in 2003, but the Bush Admin Refused to negotiate or even discuss what could have been a peaceful and politically advantageous resolution to the conflict

October 22, 2007 12:17 pm

I had heard a report of this diplomatic dispatch that was sent to the Bush Administration by the Iranians about six months ago.  However, as the way things stand in the current state of American intellectual public discourse, I did not even attempt to disseminate the report I had encountered to a wider audience.  All too often, accurate contents pertaining to incidents, which need to be incorporated into the compilation of accurate information culminating into what will become the socially legitimated journalistic narrative that will come to define our collective representations of reality – are simply ignored or cynically discounted.  I suspect that this filtering of factual reports from the permitted descriptions circulated through the modes of communication in our society takes place because corporate journalism deems the revelations too provocative and, therefore, deviating from the mundane and lacking in knee-jerk plausibility.  Corporate journalism, consequently, discards with the stories as a matter of course, since its inclusion in the contents of mass-produced journalism might incite a backlash from social elements which would have their credibility damaged if the general public was to subscribe to the validity of the report’s contents.  Consequently, these types of illuminating accounts are redacted during their processing in the distillations, constituting the gate-keeping devices belonging to the industrial-mass-journalism-complexes. 

R Cole
D o w n s i z e r - D i s p a t c h  


Recruit more Downsizers. Please forward this to others.

Quote of the Day:“How do wars start? Diplomats lie to reporters and then believe what they read in the newspapers.”
        - Karl Krauss

Subject: Iranian offer of a comprehensive settlement with the United States

In May 2003 the Iranian goverment faxed the United States government a proposal to discuss a comprehensive settlement. Prompt action on this offer could have brought peace between our two countries, and done much to stablize the entire region.

How did our government react? It snubbed the offer.

To learn more about this, and other opportunities for negotiated settlements, we recomend that you buy the current issue of “Esquire” magazine (November 2007, with Charlize Theron on the cover). Read the article “Briefing: Our Impending War with Iran” by John H. Richardson.

We have appended the text of the Iranian fax below my signature (minus diplomatic minutia about how to proceed with the discussions). There are many good things on the list of Iranian offers. There are also questionable things. The list is a starting point for negotiations, and like all negotiations, not everything on the list would be part of the final settlement.

It is important that we all be aware of what Iran offered, and of the opportunity our elected leaders threw away in a fit of moral posturing (or perhaps because they actually prefer war to peace).

Please also make your elected representatives aware that you are aware of how this issue has been handled. Please send a message to Congress asking that they pass a resolution forbidding an attack on Iran without prior Congressional approval.

In your personal comments, add that you are aware of the May 2003 Iranian offer for a comprehensive settlement, and that you are appending the text of that offer to make sure that Congress is also aware of it. You can cut and paste the text of the offer as I have appended it beneath my signature into your personal comments.

You can send your message here.

PROGRESS REPORTGoal: 1,000 monthly credit card pledgers of at least 16 cents per day ($5 per month)

Purpose: To launch Operation Everywhere — an advertising campaign designed to recruit a huge army of DC Downsizers and make Downsizing proposals like the “Read the Bills Act” seen and heard by everyone, everywhere, every day.

Status (as of close of business Friday): 5 new pledgers, 972 left to go

Relentless progress will get the job done, so we plan to be relentless. Help us prepare to exploit the new political environment that will exist after the presidential primaries are over. Congressman Ron Paul has caused an explosion of public discussion about smaller government. This discussion must not end when the campaign ends, it must expand.

Here are the new monthly pledgers: William M Woods, Larry Tranbarger, Scott Moyer, Shawn M Murray

Here are the Downsizers who made one-time donations: Frederic Herman, Jesse Mise, Jay C. McKean, Grant W. Kuhns, Aleksey Tsalolikhin

You can get your name added to the list (unless you choose not to be listed), plus receive a copy of “The Downsize DC Vision.” Just start a monthly pledge of at least 16 cents per day ($5 per month). You can do so here.

Thank you for being a DC Downsizer.Jim Babka
President
DownsizeDC.org, Inc.

Text of Iranian offer for a comprehensive settlement, May 2003:

Iranian Aims: The U.S. accepts a dialogue “in mutual respect” and agrees that Iran puts the following aims on the agenda:
Halt in US hostile behavior and rectification of status of Iran in the US: interference in internal or external relations, “axis of evil,” terrorism list

Abolishment of all sanctions: commercial sanctions, frozen assets, judgments (FSIA), impediments in international trade and financial institutions

Iraq: democratic and fully representative government in Iraq, support of Iranian claims for Iraqi reparations, respect for Iranian national interests in Iraq and religious links to Najaf/Karbal

Full access to peaceful technology, biotechnology, and chemical technology.

Recognition of Iran’s legitimate security interests in the region with according defense capacity.

Terrorism: pursuit of anti-Iranian terrorists, above all MKO (People’s Mujahedin of Iran) and support for repatriation of their members in Iraq, decisive action against anti-Iranian terrorists, above all MKO and affiliated organizations in the US

US Aims: Iran accepts a dialogue “in mutual respect” and agrees that the US puts the following aims on the agenda.

WMD: full transparency for security that there are no Iranian endeavors to develop or possess WMD, full cooperation with IAEA based on Iranian adoption of all relevant instruments (93+2) and all further IAEA protocols

Terrorism: decisive action against any terrorists (above all Al Qaida) on Iranian territory, full cooperation and exchange of all relevant information.

Iraq: coordination of Iranian influence for activity supporting stabilization and the establishment of democratic institutions and a non-religious government.

Middle East: 1) Stop any material support to Palestinian opposition groups (Hamas, Islamic Jihad, etc.) from Iranian territory, pressure on these organizations to stop violent action against civilians within borders of 1967. 2) Action on Hezbollah to become a mere political organization within Lebanon 3) Acceptance of the Arab League Beirut declaration (Saudi initiative, two-state approach)

-END-  

D o w n s i z e r - D i s p a t c h
is the official email list of
DownsizeDC.org, Inc. & Downsize DC Foundation

CONTRIBUTE to the Electronic Lobbyist project

http://www.DownsizeDC.org is sponsored by DownsizeDC.org, Inc. — a non-profit educational organization promoting the ideas of individual liberty, personal responsibility, free markets, and small government.

You are encouraged to forward this message to friends and business associates, and permission is hereby granted to reproduce any items herein as long as attribution is provided for articles and the subscription instructions above are included.


If you enjoyed this post,
Subscribe to the Free Midwest Populist Party Newsletter

Please consider a donation of $1 or more
to help keep this website active.

Spread the Word:

del.icio.us Digg Reddit Google Socializer StumbleUpon Yahoo! Help

Related Posts:



No Responses to “Iran was willing to cease uranium production in 2003, but the Bush Admin Refused to negotiate or even discuss what could have been a peaceful and politically advantageous resolution to the conflict”

Care to comment?